Parshat Vayyakhel-Pekudey

Shabbat, Circumcision and the Labors Involved in Building the Mishkan

The Gemara recounts the following conversation: "The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moses: 'Moses, I have a fine present stored in my treasure house and Shabbat is its name'(Beitsah 16).

The Torah permits violating the Shabbat in order to save a life or perform a circumcision. Thus, the holy Alshikh expresses surprise that the commandment of building the Mishkan does not take precedence over the Shabbat too. For after all, in building the Mishkan, we are, as it were, inviting the Holy One, blessed be He, to dwell among us.

In order to dispel this presumption, the Torah had to expressly declare at the beginning of Parshat Vayyakhel "These are the things which the Lord has commanded that you should do them. Six days shall work be done …"(Ex 35:1-2). The Torah teaches us that the Mishkan and its vessels during their production stages do not possess sanctity. Only when the Mishkan is fully established does the Shekhinah dwell in it. The building of the Mishkan is only the means to an end, not the end itself.

The Shabbat possesses intrinsic sanctity that overflows onto us, endowing us with the extra Shabbat soul (nefesh yeteirah ). Additionally, the Shabbat's sanctity takes precedence over (and, indeed, preceded) the Creation of the world, as the Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moses: "A beloved [present] hidden away …"

Performing a circumcision and saving a life preempt the Shabbat because every Israelite is considered holy (cf. Isaiah 3:4), for Israel is sanctified to the Lord (cf. Jeremiah 2:3). And, furthermore, on Shabbat Hashem directs an effluence of holiness to envelope every Jew; each and every individual is gathered under the wings of the Shekhinah touched to the very roots of his specific soul. Thus, man enters a dialogue with his Creator and in connecting with Him is separated from his externals.

Symbolizing this process, Jews are forbidden on Shabbat to carry objects from the private domain – an allusion to the authority that we cleave to – to the public one, an allusion to the "world of separation" (olam ha-peirud) from wherein the other nations derive. Likewise, Jews are forbidden to carry objects from the public domain into the private one for symbolically this would bring about a mixing of the holy and the profane (hol), or the profane and the holy, be that as it may. By analogy this insight can be applied to explain why the other creative labors are forbidden on Shabbat. For the labors are of a piece with the mundane (hol ) world, and resting from them smacks of the sanctified supernal world.

Thus, we may deduce that Judaism perceives the particular, the individual human being, the private domain to be holy, while the public domain, the outside, is profane. And the holy and the profane may not be mixed, except for the purpose of preparing food (on the festival days). But on Shabbat, there is no need whatsoever for the profane.

Thus, we may also deduce that Shabbat possesses intrinsic sanctity independent of how man treats it. Indeed, far from Shabbat being dependent upon man for its stature, man depends upon and is intoxicated by the Shabbat. During the six days of productivity, man worships Hashem by sanctifying the world. Like Shammai and Hillel he accomplishes this by performing the mundane labors for the sake of Heaven. As the Gemara in Beitsa relates, when Shammai saw a choice animal during the week, he would declare: "This animal is for Shabbat." However, if Shammai found a choicer animal later in the week, he would eat the first animal he had found and keep the latter for Shabbat. When Hillel chanced upon a choice animal during the week, he would eat it, trusting that G-d would cause a choicer one to cross his path before Shabbat, saying: "Blessed [art Thou] Hashem each and every day."

Perhaps the distinction between Hillel's and Shammai's positions stems from Hillel's leaning toward anthropocentrism and Shammai's leaning towards theocentrism . Hillel conceived of divine worship as man fulfilling his tasks for the sake of Heaven. Shammai adopted a more literal approach to the phrase divine worship: the divine is a value both as the object and central focus of the worship.

Thus, for Shammai, Shabbat functions as an aspect of the divine presence connected to Hashem, so the Shabbat can unmediatedly express His presence; man does not need to function as a bridge to the Divine. Man must relate to the Shabbat via the unmediated presence of the mitzvah ; he cannot relate directly to G-d. Hillel views man's sanctification of the material world through his labors as an expression of his divine worship, a level attainable not only via performing G-d's commandments.

The divine attribute of mercy stems from an anthropocentric orientation, Hillel's.

The divine attribute of justice (din ) stems from a theocentric orientation – Shammai's.

Likewise, the priestly categorizations as "emissary of the Merciful One" or as "emissary of the congregation" may also be defined as, respectively, theocentrically and anthropocentrically oriented. This distinction is later applied to the two types of righteous men.

Indeed, Hashem is worshipped in both ways: Observing the Shabbat engenders a theocentric approach; worshipping Hashem during the six days of the work-a-day week engenders an anthropocentric one where man's holiness manifests itself.

That performing a circumcision and saving a life preempts the Shabbat is due to the anthropocentric tendency. Circumcision, by removing the orlah, actually reveals the inherent holiness in man who was created in the image of G-d.

An idolater who observes a day of rest is liable to be put to death (Sanhedrin 58b):

Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said in the name of Rabbi Yochanan: When a king and a noblewoman are conversing, if someone breaks into their conversation is he not liable to be put to death? Likewise, the Shabbat is [a sign] between the Holy One, blessed be He, and Israel, as it is written: "It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever [le-'olam ]"(Ex 31:13). (Deut Rabbah 1:21)

As the midrash notes, the word le-'olam is written without a vav. So it contains a double entendre, meaning "for ever" and "concealed". The secret bond between Hashem and Israel is created by the Shabbat through the extra soul (nefesh yeteirah) which cleaves to Him, may He be blessed, in the "world of unification"(olam ha-achdut ). So how can someone whose soul is external (the gentile) place himself between those who cleave to one another. Thus, the Shabbat reality is by its very nature theocentric, while the gentile's worship is exclusively anthropocentric, completely divorced from the dimension of holiness; performed solely for the sake of Heaven without the deeper grasp that Jews can obtain by observing the theocentric commandments.

Translated by Rabbi Meshulam Gotlieb
www.MGtransEd.com